Pauline Kedem Tallen stands as a prominent figure in Nigeria’s politics, recognized for her extensive contributions spanning decades, starting from 1976. However, could her recent clash with the judiciary over “contemptuous” comments on a judicial ruling now cast a shadow over her illustrious political career, potentially signaling a turning point in her longstanding presence on the Nigerian political stage?
The woman
A native of Shendam, she embarked on her political journey in 1976 as a clerical officer and later ascended through various roles, ultimately becoming the Minister for Women Affairs and Social Development in 2019.
Tallen had expressed dissatisfaction with a court’s decision, and had referred to it as a “Kangaroo judgement” and urged Nigerians to reject it
Her political career saw her hold various positions, including Minister of State for Science and Technology and Deputy Governor of Plateau State. Her refusal of an ambassadorial nomination in 2015 and subsequent legal battles showcased her commitment to principles.
Personal and legal challenges
Tallen’s personal life also attracted attention, including legal disputes with the son. Despite facing challenges, she also received numerous awards and accolades for her contributions to women’s development, education, and science and technology in Nigeria.
A political figure at the crossroads
As a former minister, Tallen finds herself at a crucial juncture, now grappling with a court order that could reshape her political legacy. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the intersection between personal opinion and the responsibilities that come with public office, leaving Nigerians and the political landscape eagerly anticipating the next chapter in this unfolding saga.
The verdict
In a surprising turn of events, the Federal Capital Territory High Court, on Monday, in Abuja issued a restraining order against Pauline Tallen, preventing her from holding any public office in Nigeria, delivered as a consequence of her alleged “disparaging” comments regarding a court decision in Adamawa State.
The controversy stems from the nullification of Aishatu Dahiru’s candidacy. Popularly known as Binani, the All Progressive Congress (APC), governorship candidate by the Federal High Court in Yola, Adamawa, in which she had secured victory in the party’s primary elections, but the court, led by Justice Abdulaziz Anka, nullified her win due to non-compliance with electoral laws and party guidelines.
The court condemned Tallen’s statement as unconstitutional, careless, reckless and disparaging
Tallen’s critique
Tallen, expressing dissatisfaction with the court’s decision, had referred to it as a “Kangaroo Judgement” and urged Nigerians to reject it.
The President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Yakubu Maikyau, demanded an apology from Tallen for her comments with cautions of potential legal action.
Unyielding, Tallen’s stance prompted the NBA to file a suit at the Federal Capital Territory High Court.
Court’s rebuke
The court, in its judgment, condemned Tallen’s statement as unconstitutional, careless, reckless and disparaging” It deemed her call to disobey the court’s decision as “contemptuous.”
However, the court provided an avenue for redemption, offering Tallen the option to escape the consequences if she issued a public apology into national dailies within 30 days.
Redemption or ravage
To avoid the injunction preventing her from holding public office becoming perpetual, the court mandated Tallen to publish a personally signed apology letter to Nigerians and the judiciary on a full page of The PUNCH and The Guardian newspapers as failure to comply within the stipulated 30 days would result in a permanent bar from holding public office.
Yet to tender apology
Tallen, a stalwart of the APC and former deputy governor of Plateau state had alleged the marginalization of women in Nigerian politics.
Despite the calls from the NBA President for an apology, Tallen had remained silent. The NBA recounted its attempts to seek redress, stating that a letter demanding an act of contrition was sent to Ms. Tallen, but it went unanswered, ultimately resulting in the legal action.
The unanswered question
As of this report, Tallen’s response to the court is still being expected. The public awaits whether she will comply with the court’s directive, issue the required apology, or choose to appeal the decision at a higher court.
Undoubtedly, the outcome will shape her political future and influence the perception of her long-standing contributions to Nigerian politics.
